European Security: Does NATO Prepare Place of Arms in Baltic Region?

Новости

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

 

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why sho uld we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forcesp style=»text-align: justify;»/p have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has mPresidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.ore than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining ma /pin exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

 

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why sho uld we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forcesp style=»text-align: justify;»/p have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has mPresidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.ore than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining ma /pin exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

At present NATO conducts one military operation in Libya. In this operation participate more than 200 aircrafts supported by navy. The whole world is currently discussing the event because of many losses among civilians. But the fact that the NATO does not as active in Libya as in other conflicts, using only tactical group is surprising.

Meanwhile in Baltic region is deploying a strategic group which is working through a large-scale war scenario in Europe. A simple person can see the threat to the European Security. But it is astonishing that mass media and famous Wikileaks do not mention those events.

NATO military exercise in Baltic region Baltic Host – 2011 was supposed to work through the possibilities of Baltic countries in deploying international troops according to the representative of the Estonian Main Staff colonel Ants Kiviselg. The legend of the event was imaginary situation in an imaginary state.

But it is surprising that along with territorial defence forces some civilian Ministries responsible for roads, health, sea and air ports railroad were engaged in this training. Where is the destination point for the NATO troops transportation by the railroad?

Meanwhile two more NATO events of combat operational training took place in Great Britain, Sweden and Baltic water area.

First of them Joint Warrior – 2011 was a combined NATO air and navy training which main aim was to work through the use of air and navy strike forces in order to reconcile a regional dispute. 40 aircrafts, 40 combat ships and more than 6 000 servicemen have participated in the event.

The second one called Viking – 2011 was aimed to apply NATO forces in the imaginary international peacekeeping operation (about 2 000 servicemen).

Altogether it was more than 8 000 servicemen and very large air and navy group. And all those above mentioned events were connected with each other.

It is also very strange that those military events have a close time connection to the destabilisation of situation in the ex-URSS region. It is to mention “color” revolution in some countries as well as terrorist acts in Minsk on the 11th of April 2011.

Currently NATO conducts an operation in Libya (tactical group) and in the same time in the very heart of Europe creates strategic strike force. For the Allied countries this camouflaged strategic exercise is more important, than participation in the international operation in Libya. Although NATO members count well their money. Before Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan operations they have refused to conduct any large-scale exercises because of expenses.

Trying to understand the concept of the above mentioned exercises which are more important than the possibility to capture Libyan oil reserves it is necessary to go back to the years 2008 – 2010.

Defensive Plans for Poland and Baltic countries

Since Poland and Baltic countries have became NATO members the territory and the armed forces of those countries have changed a lot. At that time NATO was moving eastwards.

In 2008 some forces within NATO have decided that it was the very time to divide the ex-URSS region. There were some declarations coming from M.Olbright, Z.Bzhezinsky, and C.Rice that the time to share resources has come.

First tries to disintegrate Russia and its main ally Belarus have started in the same time. To reach the aim they have applied all necessary measures, including meat, milk and gas “wars”, “declared” to Belarus by some Russian pro-Western politicians. But they have failed.

The second stage of informational campaign has begun in 2009 and was to show to the public opinion the necessity of democracy imposing on Belarus as well as future Russia absorption by NATO. To realise that project all key positions in MFA and other Ministries were given to pro-NATO politicians. After that Poland and Baltic countries have declared that they have some fears concerning Eastern threat. Presently neither Russia, conducting its large military reform nor small Belarus can menace any NATO country. However after Joint Russia-Belarus exercise “Zapad — 2009” (West — 2009), which was held by Belarusian side, new NATO members have declared that Russia, along with Belarus prepare aggression against them. By the way it is necessary to mention, that some NATO observers were invited to that exercise and they could observe whatever they wanted. After the exercise the head of the Alliance has stated that this training was defensive only.

The third step was to spread rumours (or it is better to say “disinformation”) about Poland and Baltic countries defensive plans. Those plans are supposed to be disinformation because they are not defensive. Let us try to prove this thesis.

Why does Poland and Baltic countries NATO defensive plans are not defensive?

First of all it is necessary to underline, that the NATO training system consists of stage-by-stage computer exercises with all staff levels. During those exercises participants take decisions and plan military operations. After that there are large-scale exercises involving troops to work through real plans. All those exercises have one main concept and last from 2 months up to one year.

Main NATO operational and combat training events are conducted in regions of potential operations for capture of natural resources or preventive measures against possible danger (before it becomes a threat).

In 2012 NATO has conducted a set of exercises. It was not surprising because such events are carried out annually. But analysis of situation allows to conclude that there is a new region and a new enemy. Let us try to find it out examining main exercises held by NATO in Baltic region in 2010.

From 12 to 24 April 2010 took place NATO navy and air exercises “Brilliant Mariner” and “Brilliant Ardent”. At the same time another NATO control system and signal event “Steadfast Cathode” was conducted in the sea area of Northern and Baltic seas. During those events Alliance forces worked through offensive air campaign against imaginary state, having large natural resources. This imaginary state is obviously Russia. It is to notice that in the same time Germany held NATO Special Forces exercise.

From 10 to 14 April took place Command Staff Exercise “Steadfast Move” and from 31 April to 5 May another Command Staff Exercise “Baltic Host”. The aim of those exercises was to work through NATO troops’ transportation in the crisis regions, their deployment in the Baltic countries. It is to underline, that Alliance plans to deploy its troops and not to defend Baltic countries. Further we will consider the tasks of the contingent.

If we connect the first and the second stage we will see the logic development of the situation. After navy and air phase (exercises “Brilliant”) which were to destroy all military infrastructure and command and control system, NATO works through land operation against the same adversary. This enemy is an imaginary state which does not want to share its resources. The developers did not succeed with the pretext for the exercise. The imaginary state “Sandora” has some inner as well as outer problems with neighbour states who aspire for some “Sandora” territories. The idea of those exercises was to conduct a peacekeeping operation in this unstable region. If we thoroughly examine the geopolitical situation in this region we will understand that Sandora has some similarities with Pytalovsky region (this territory belongs to Russia but recently Latvia claimed for this region). As a matter of fact NATO forces have worked through military operation against two “Sandora” brigades (76th airborne and 138th motorized infantry brigades) which are similar to Russian military units in the Northern-West strategic direction.

But the scale of this operation is doubtful. To conduct such an operation it is enough to redeploy a part of NATO prior forces (up to 3 brigades) and in cooperation with armed forces of the neighbour states separate warring parties

In reality during those exercises NATO worked through strategic regrouping. Those exercises allowed to arrange sea ports and airfields, railroads and to build roads in Baltic dunes. This work was really done. If you do not believe it you may visit the region.

To prove the above mentioned facts it is necessary to notice that this year Latvia and Estonia refused the Rail Baltica project (this project provide to connect Talinn and Warsaw by railroad inside EU). Nevertheless those countries have found enough money to arrange high speed rail road from Riga to Moscow. This is a classic example of a potential enemy operational territory arranging.

After that from 7 up to 18 June NATO has conducted joint navy exercise “Baltops” in the Baltic sea and shore. The aim of the exercise was to mine sweep the sea area, disembark troops and cargoes, redeploy armored vehicles by railroad.

It is to notice that only US marines and weapons and equipment disembarked during the exercise. To realise this task Americans used amphibians, marines and armor vehicles including “Abrams” tanks which are far from being peacekeeping).

During that exercise NATO forces have worked through air and navy operation on defeating the remains of Russian Baltic Fleet after air phase as well as support of following debarkation of main forces. By the way Big Russian Landing Ship (BLS) from Baltic Fleet has taken part in this exercise. As a result Russian Baltic Fleet newspaper has written that only BLS has reach all goals of the exercise.

During the “Saber Strike – 2011” exercise (2011 means that money was taken from 2011 budget funds) USA has worked through strategic regrouping of its forces within Baltic countries. But the scale will be different. American Tern container ships were used instead of landing ships. After deployment of troops heavy combat vehicles were transported by railroad to the Adaji training ground where the deployment base was installed.

The issue is that American equipment could easily stay in Baltic countries because they do not take part in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

Analysis of the NATO (US) exercises, conducted in 2010 shows that Baltic countries are forced to stay off this Treaty. The fact that in the very heart of Europe there are three countries (being EU members and supposed to be democratic) which have not signed such a Treaty breaks the all basic principles of international security.

European community and international organizations have to stop all relations with such states. But this situation is convenient to the US because they can deploy any contingent in Baltic countries.

This situation along with nuclear weapons and deploying anti-missile defence system will not benefit to the European security and may cause confrontations and lead to the “Cold War”.

This scenario shows only superficial analysis of NATO combat operational activities in Europe. Those who have access to the classified information can see the working through of military activity in a single operational field in Arctic region, Karelia, Pridnestrovie and Caucasus.

The future of Europe

Those Baltic exercises will be conducted on an annual basis. The first stage (Baltic Host) has already passed. IN the nearest future we will see the next stages (Baltops and Sabre Strike) which will be conducted in summer-autumn 2011.

It is undoubtedly that the quantity of NATO troops during those exercises will increase. In the same time Polish and Baltic MFA representatives (being active NATO intelligence agents) will restart their declarations about the Eastern threat. Meanwhile pro-Western political engineers in Russia such as Zatulin, Sheremet, Souzdaltsev, Selin and others will begin a new informational war against Belarus.

It is to underline that NATO has always acted in advance. Letts oppression in Pytalovsky region of Pskov, Poles oppression in Belarus, accusations of Russia in the wrong share of Arctic Shelf may be used as a pretext for some Alliance activities.

NATO exercises are the first step to the real warfare in the Centre of Europe. This statement can be easily proved by air NATO operation in Libya. Alliance members leaders have declared that this operation has not been planned previously and that strike forces have been created 48 hours before the operation.

But Algerian newspaper “Expression” has published the information that France and Great Britain was preparing for the operation three months before the aggression by planning an exercise “South Mistral” which should be held on 21-25 March. According to the main idea of the event allies had to attack an imaginary state (South Land) lead by a dictator in the Mediterranean.

NATO prepares offensive activities against Russia. Virtual training of NATO strike force in the exercise “Baltic Host 2011” proves it.

It is also surprising that Internet mass media does not pay any attention to such activities. It seems that this topic is classified and somebody wants to hide the truth.

Russia’s military doctrine interprets the threats coming from USA and its allies as an aspiration for give global functions to the NATO potential and approximate Alliance members infrastructure to the Russian borders. Also it declares that Alliance aspire for deploy and strengthen military contingents on the neighbouring land and adjoining sea territories.

There following questions:

How large should be NATO grouping during exercises in Baltic countries for the persons who are responsible for Russia security pay attention to treat such situation as a real military threat? Maybe Ms Chapman aspire for coming into Russian parliament in order to explain the situation to Russian politicians?

How much time does Alliance need in order to destroy command and control, air and space defence systems as well as strategic infrastructure of European part of Russia with the NATO grouping, deployed for the so called “exercises”?

We can draw an analogy with the events of 22nd June 1941 when Stalin did not believe in the surprise while Hitler was assuring him that german troops were standing near Soviet border in order to strike England. History lessons are fast to forget.

Russian politologist Maxim Kalashnikov in his book “fight for the air” has shown that NATO is planning to strike Russia. But at that time nobody wanted to listen to him in spite of the fact that his predictions come true.

An incorrect analysis is made concerning Belarus. It is unlikely that NATO will strike Belarus. A military commander will never let his aircrafts flight over Belarusian anti-aircraft defense systems and his land troops fight against forces of territorial defence. Everybody has memories about Belarusian partisans during 2nd World War.

That is why Poland works through defense plans in order to hold back Russian-Belarus regional grouping of troops as well as Baltic fleet in Kaliningrad. This is necessary for the deployed in Baltic countries troops to provide strike on Moscow and Saint-Petersbourg after air phase. If we take a look on the map we can see that this way is shorter then to go through Minsk. In addition no one will press the red button because this will lead to total annihilation of human beings.

If we take into consideration “holes” in Russian defensive potential in the North-Western strategic direction we can see the routes for NATO troops after deployment going from Riga to Moscow and from Tallinn to Saint-Petersbourg.

Thereby NATO and Allied State of Russia and Belarus as well as Organisation of Collective Security Treaty come back to the period of “Cold War” in spite of complex military-politic and economic situation in the world. Russian and Belarusian presidents have already proposed how to solve this problem.

What to do?

The Russian President has suggested to the Alliance and European countries to limit any military activity on the NATO-Russia and Belarus border as well as to create a new security system in Europe. There are some practical steps – in 2010 and 2011 there were no large-scale exercise in the Kaliningrad region as well as in Belarus. Those appeals remained unheard by Western politicians.

During the BRICS last forum held on April 2011 Russian President Medvedev has underlined his position on obligatory conflicts resolvation by diplomatic means. This suggestion was supported by other heads of states.

A.Lukashenko has more than once declared inefficiency of UN and OSCE as well as necessity to reconsider the regional security issues (including Astana 2010 forum)

H.Chavez right after the beginning of military operation in Libya has appealed to create a new international organization which would be able to resist any military threat.

All those appeals remain unanswered but the informational war results in the last events in Mediterranean, Kirgizia, Moldova, Georgia and Nagorny Karabakh.

In those conditions there is only one way out – to make more active all international organizations which are important and defend peace (outside UN and OSCE) as well as oppose them to the global policemen acting according to the principle “divide et impere”

Organisation of Collective Security Treaty, BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and other should apply to US and NATO in order to stop all military activity.

Russia and Belarus should require from NATO to stop all exercises near the borders of Allied State.

Nowadays there is a necessity to create in Europe new security system based on the principles of protection of national interests’ and not supernational corporations of USA.

This process is already on the way. The USA conducts secret operation against France and Germany in order to hold them under its influence. One day this will be uncovered and the relations between Alliance members will be damaged. The de Gaulle spirit will suggest to European peoples how to provide security.

Recently the mass media has raised the contradictions between Europe and NATO. Those contradictions have appeared 2 years ago after the fall of URSS and now they are at their peak.

Fred Kaplan in his article in “Slate” has written: “Why should we have NATO? Why does it still exist? Does it a symbol or some kind of fig leaf of international legitimacy to cover all military operation undertaken by NATO?”

The NATO commander in Kosovo (1999-2000) German general Klaus Reinhardt calls for cancel military operation in Libya and to start negotiations with M.Kaddafi. And with it he makes reference to his Balkans experience when the death of civilians in Serbia was stopped only after negotiations with belligerent parties.

The head of state being the commander in chief has to be brave. This courage is needed for taking decisions in order to opposite national interests to the interests of powers that be.

French President de Gaulle in 1971 refused dollars and claimed gold. If other heads of states followed him we would never see world economic crisis and following wars and conflicts.

A.Lukashenko  in 1999 has visited Belgrade while it was bombed by NATO in order to support Yugoslavian people. If other European leaders or UN and OSCE officials followed his example aggression would be stop and many people would survive.

Presidents of France and Russia have diplomatically stopped Georgian aggression and following confrontation in international relations within the conditions of informational campaign, unleashed by USA.

Heads of Turkey, Germany and Spain have refused to participate in some US military campaigns.

Unfortunately many modern European politicians can only think about their own money. The initiators of integration processes are the leaders of Russia and Belarus and not the heads of “democratic” European states.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Этот сайт использует Akismet для борьбы со спамом. Узнайте как обрабатываются ваши данные комментариев.