Europe’s future is in Eurasia Union

Геополитика и безопасность

Modern world has a very complex and polyhedral geopolitical scheme. Political and economic processes testify the transfer from bipolar to unipolar system. The US hegemony set up after the fall of the USSR does not respond to actual challenges. This statement is proven not only by famous European politicians but also by their overseas colleagues. Even Z.Bzhezinsky (the ideologist of the SU fall) admit that the golden age of control over society by the mass media is already done.

Instead of this old system we see the appearance of a totally new one which declares the independence of Europe from the USA. The economic pattern imposed by the New World after the Second World War shows its bankruptcy. As a result, financial and economic depression marked the end of the past decade.

Some political scientists believe that the whole world is on the edge of the second, more destructive wave of crisis. In addition the gap between rich and poor became dramatically wider and the number of starving aims to touch the 1 billion people figure.

Such situation leads to protests in many Western Europe countries as well as in the USA. And the increasing role of Russia and China may shift the geopolitical landscape. The number of those who support the idea of political economic and military transformation in Europe grows dramatically. There is a need of a new security system from Vladivostok to Brest (France). Large geopolitical changes that we may see in the nearest future may be also influenced by the system of oil and gas transport net which covers the whole Eurasia continent.

Hydrocarbons fuel the engine of geopolitical changes

In all times humanity had something that was of enormous value. Navigators tried to find the shortest way to India and discovered America. Later the Gold Rush influenced the exploration of new lands. But always the war accompanied the rush over fortune.

The development of technologies has shifted the emphasis to the hydrocarbons. Actually oil is called “Black Gold”. Nowadays almost all wars aim to own oil deposits. It took a couple of decades to the USA to clear the road to Middle East hydrocarbons and now they plan to attack Iran in order to establish a total influence in that region. The inhabitants of the White House understand well that those who have most of oil reserves will rule the world.

The core engine of future geopolitical changes in Europe will be oil and gas from Russia as well as from South Eastern Asia. Pipelines coming from East to West will determine basic cooperation directions.

Today Western Europe depends on the oil and gas delivery from Eastern part of the continent. Germany cooperates with Russia within the framework of “Nord Stream”. Gas pipeline “Nabucco” will cover Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Turkey. The nearest future shows some kind of politic and economic idyll on the continent.

Russia established good relations with Western Europe and aspire to develop the Southern one. “Gasprom” participate in building pipelines in Asia. Those steps of Kremlin conflict with USA interests. The White House plans to own the whole local pipeline infrastructure, e.g. the TAPI pipeline (which costs about 7,6 billion US dollars)

Russia also has interest in IPI project. Despite the fact that India has rejected to participate in it (under the pressure of the USA) China is ready to cooperate with IPI.

One of the core target of the USA in the region is to press out Russia from here. To solve this problem the White House has to destroy Iran. In this case Russia will not be able to protect its interests in the South Eastern Asia region.

Europe’s future is its own affair

Today we are witness of geopolitical changes in the world. Russia take active steps in order to influence not only in Asia but also in Europe. European states that do not have hydrocarbons cooperate with Russia. The advantages of such a cooperation are the following – Russia take only money for its resources and USA wants loyalty and solidarity in the idea of its hegemony. But leading European states want to argue this idea. Germany for example becomes more and more independent. Turkey refuses to give data from NATO AMD radars to Israel.

French government also understand that they can live without the USA. As a result we may see some geopolitical changes in the nearest future. Besides Russia aspires to create Eurasian Union and this organization may became alternative to the EU.

Regarding all those possible changes the White House starts to be more active on the borders of Russia. The USA still have polish and Baltic “Aces” and they may play them as soon as they need it. One of those who support the idea of joint NATO exercises is Lithuanian chief of the MOD. She is afraid of Russian invasion. Her phobias became stronger after the Russian-Georgian conflict.

On the other hand Russia and Belarus refused to conduct any training maneuver near NATO borders. In 2012 Poland and Baltic countries again will host NATO exercises on their territory. They will continue to work through possible conflict with Russia. But why? Because of the USA interests in the region. And they want to disturb the EU Russia cooperation by using such countries as Poland, Latvia and Lithuania. In this point the US interests find cohesion with those of Baltic countries and Warsaw.

The main problem lies in the fact that Russia and in this area easily find buyers for its hydrocarbons, and is constantly developing its pipeline, gradually switching to the Europeans, Middle Eastern and North African-controlled White House hydrocarbon sources on their own.

In this vein, it is clear the negative attitude of Poland and the Baltic countries to have a running pipeline «Nord Stream». All of these countries only lose by commissioning a joint Russian-German project. Transit only lose money, and the U.S. — its influence. And it costs much more money.

So the White House seeking to split the relations between Russia and Western Europe, cleverly hiding behind NATO. At last in the 2010 Lisbon Summit, NATO is not without power in Washington, the allies in the alliance have pretended not to hear the Russian president’s message about the necessity of building a new system of international security from Vancouver to Vladivostok. But there was also a positive signal at the summit was to support the position of the Russian leader of his French counterpart.

The inevitability of geopolitical changes have a significant impact on the existing economic model, which now hold the majority of Western countries. The fact that the first financial-economic crisis that struck the planet in the first decade of the millennium, has clearly demonstrated, even the most skeptical that the current economic model, which is tricky because there are residents of the White House has become obsolete.

At the time, the Americans pushed the German war machine (for example, the grandfather of former U.S. President George W. Bush Jr. supplied the oil in Germany) in order to maximize ease continental states and then to impose its own terms. Immediately after the Second World War, New World, by giving loans made in Western Europe’s economic model, which allows you to control the majority of the States of the European part of the continent. In parallel with these processes, Washington has made great efforts to break the «Red Block», and then to weaken Russia and to prevent its influence on Europe. To this end, the U.S. unleashed the war and continue to unleash all the key points of the planet, changing the geopolitical orientation of not only individual countries but also entire regions.

U.S. still supported the individual, the weakest economically and militarily to Western Europe, continue to reshape the planet for themselves. But deprived of such support, they quickly lose not only their power, but the leading role in the global chess game. The current financial and economic model allows Washington not to worry about their future. Even in the case of extreme crisis the world the West will have to save America first, and then take care of their interests. After the collapse of the U.S. not only destroy one of the most saturated markets in the world. Falling into the abyss, the U.S. economy will carry off for themselves all of their «achievements», which she had so long and successfully cultivated on the basis of Western civilization.

For the first time such thoughts visited one of the heroes of the Second World War, General de Gaulle, who plunged a large amount of cash in the American ships and sent them to the U.S. to change the green «wrappers» for gold in France, which had already been stored in the ocean. Flustered by such impudence, the Americans eventually paid off with the presumptuous Frenchman. However, to repeat his audacious act of the French president could not. In 1969 he resigned as head of state. Since then, nobody even tried, though a hint question that is the economic model imposed by the U.S. Europe, could be wrong, unfair and even predatory. And it lasted until the first financial crisis of 2008. Gaddafi was killed because he dared to say that will not sell the Libyan oil for U.S. dollars. The next step is Iran.

Today, when the whole of Europe is under pressure from debt problems, the leaders of EU member states are aware that something needs to change. It is understood by ordinary citizens, who are increasingly satisfied as peaceful demonstrations, riots and frank, as the scales are already seems crowded. Why are there united Europe! Even in the United States develops movement «Occupy the Wall Street,» which aims to fight against the established financial and economic system, where only the rich get richer and the poor even more immersed in the abyss of poverty.

This can only mean one thing — Europe than ever we need a new system of economic and, above all, military security. Already, the EU draws their attention not on the West and the East. Everyone is expecting a possible interference with the decision of the European crisis from China. By the way, analysts do not exclude the Russian Federation in helping to address the debt burdens of the United Europe. What does this mean? Just the fact that in economic terms, the Old World, it seems, begins to tire of the ubiquitous Yankees and looking for new ways of development.

A good alternative to U.S. hegemony could be the same SCO, and the foundation of security in the post-founded by the CSTO. It is these organizations are equal partners in the EU on the mainland, not the U.S..

The future of Eastern Europe

United Europe is not as united as it may seem at first glance. As its basis, Germany and France are trying to pursue a more independent of U.S. policy. As has been pointed out earlier, these states have gradually come to understand what is required to work more closely with Russia, as it promises not only to certain preferences on prices for hydrocarbons, but also the opportunity to lead a more independent multi-vector policy.

But the U.S. through NATO seek to destabilize the situation on the eastern borders of the EU, and thereby prevent the economic, political and military co-operation of the Single Europe and Russia.

It should be noted that the overseas partner is actually «killed» the economy, as well as the armed forces of the new European members of NATO, such as Hungary, Romania, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, the Baltic countries.

In the coming geopolitical changes that the state will either have to change their orientation with the pro-American to European, or give up their sovereignty. An exception can only be Poland, which with its armed forces are strong enough and can have their position. However, without U.S. support, the Poles, too, will need to look very different orientations.

Therefore, all these states will either have to establish relations with Russia and its allies, or to remain «islands of resistance,» Europe-wide trends. This position is a losing, as all Euro-Asian integration processes (promising good economic and political dividends) will bypass them by.

Modern world has a very complex and polyhedral geopolitical scheme. Political and economic processes testify the transfer from bipolar to unipolar system. The US hegemony set up after the fall of the USSR does not respond to actual challenges. This statement is proven not only by famous European politicians but also by their overseas colleagues. Even Z.Bzhezinsky (the ideologist of the SU fall) admit that the golden age of control over society by the mass media is already done.

Instead of this old system we see the appearance of a totally new one which declares the independence of Europe from the USA. The economic pattern imposed by the New World after the Second World War shows its bankruptcy. As a result, financial and economic depression marked the end of the past decade.

Some political scientists believe that the whole world is on the edge of the second, more destructive wave of crisis. In addition the gap between rich and poor became dramatically wider and the number of starving aims to touch the 1 billion people figure.

Such situation leads to protests in many Western Europe countries as well as in the USA. And the increasing role of Russia and China may shift the geopolitical landscape. The number of those who support the idea of political economic and military transformation in Europe grows dramatically. There is a need of a new security system from Vladivostok to Brest (France). Large geopolitical changes that we may see in the nearest future may be also influenced by the system of oil and gas transport net which covers the whole Eurasia continent.

Hydrocarbons fuel the engine of geopolitical changes

In all times humanity had something that was of enormous value. Navigators tried to find the shortest way to India and discovered America. Later the Gold Rush influenced the exploration of new lands. But always the war accompanied the rush over fortune.

The development of technologies has shifted the emphasis to the hydrocarbons. Actually oil is called “Black Gold”. Nowadays almost all wars aim to own oil deposits. It took a couple of decades to the USA to clear the road to Middle East hydrocarbons and now they plan to attack Iran in order to establish a total influence in that region. The inhabitants of the White House understand well that those who have most of oil reserves will rule the world.

The core engine of future geopolitical changes in Europe will be oil and gas from Russia as well as from South Eastern Asia. Pipelines coming from East to West will determine basic cooperation directions.

Today Western Europe depends on the oil and gas delivery from Eastern part of the continent. Germany cooperates with Russia within the framework of “Nord Stream”. Gas pipeline “Nabucco” will cover Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Turkey. The nearest future shows some kind of politic and economic idyll on the continent.

Russia established good relations with Western Europe and aspire to develop the Southern one. “Gasprom” participate in building pipelines in Asia. Those steps of Kremlin conflict with USA interests. The White House plans to own the whole local pipeline infrastructure, e.g. the TAPI pipeline (which costs about 7,6 billion US dollars)

Russia also has interest in IPI project. Despite the fact that India has rejected to participate in it (under the pressure of the USA) China is ready to cooperate with IPI.

One of the core target of the USA in the region is to press out Russia from here. To solve this problem the White House has to destroy Iran. In this case Russia will not be able to protect its interests in the South Eastern Asia region.

Europe’s future is its own affair

Today we are witness of geopolitical changes in the world. Russia take active steps in order to influence not only in Asia but also in Europe. European states that do not have hydrocarbons cooperate with Russia. The advantages of such a cooperation are the following – Russia take only money for its resources and USA wants loyalty and solidarity in the idea of its hegemony. But leading European states want to argue this idea. Germany for example becomes more and more independent. Turkey refuses to give data from NATO AMD radars to Israel.

French government also understand that they can live without the USA. As a result we may see some geopolitical changes in the nearest future. Besides Russia aspires to create Eurasian Union and this organization may became alternative to the EU.

Regarding all those possible changes the White House starts to be more active on the borders of Russia. The USA still have polish and Baltic “Aces” and they may play them as soon as they need it. One of those who support the idea of joint NATO exercises is Lithuanian chief of the MOD. She is afraid of Russian invasion. Her phobias became stronger after the Russian-Georgian conflict.

On the other hand Russia and Belarus refused to conduct any training maneuver near NATO borders. In 2012 Poland and Baltic countries again will host NATO exercises on their territory. They will continue to work through possible conflict with Russia. But why? Because of the USA interests in the region. And they want to disturb the EU Russia cooperation by using such countries as Poland, Latvia and Lithuania. In this point the US interests find cohesion with those of Baltic countries and Warsaw.

The main problem lies in the fact that Russia and in this area easily find buyers for its hydrocarbons, and is constantly developing its pipeline, gradually switching to the Europeans, Middle Eastern and North African-controlled White House hydrocarbon sources on their own.

In this vein, it is clear the negative attitude of Poland and the Baltic countries to have a running pipeline «Nord Stream». All of these countries only lose by commissioning a joint Russian-German project. Transit only lose money, and the U.S. — its influence. And it costs much more money.

So the White House seeking to split the relations between Russia and Western Europe, cleverly hiding behind NATO. At last in the 2010 Lisbon Summit, NATO is not without power in Washington, the allies in the alliance have pretended not to hear the Russian president’s message about the necessity of building a new system of international security from Vancouver to Vladivostok. But there was also a positive signal at the summit was to support the position of the Russian leader of his French counterpart.

The inevitability of geopolitical changes have a significant impact on the existing economic model, which now hold the majority of Western countries. The fact that the first financial-economic crisis that struck the planet in the first decade of the millennium, has clearly demonstrated, even the most skeptical that the current economic model, which is tricky because there are residents of the White House has become obsolete.

At the time, the Americans pushed the German war machine (for example, the grandfather of former U.S. President George W. Bush Jr. supplied the oil in Germany) in order to maximize ease continental states and then to impose its own terms. Immediately after the Second World War, New World, by giving loans made in Western Europe’s economic model, which allows you to control the majority of the States of the European part of the continent. In parallel with these processes, Washington has made great efforts to break the «Red Block», and then to weaken Russia and to prevent its influence on Europe. To this end, the U.S. unleashed the war and continue to unleash all the key points of the planet, changing the geopolitical orientation of not only individual countries but also entire regions.

U.S. still supported the individual, the weakest economically and militarily to Western Europe, continue to reshape the planet for themselves. But deprived of such support, they quickly lose not only their power, but the leading role in the global chess game. The current financial and economic model allows Washington not to worry about their future. Even in the case of extreme crisis the world the West will have to save America first, and then take care of their interests. After the collapse of the U.S. not only destroy one of the most saturated markets in the world. Falling into the abyss, the U.S. economy will carry off for themselves all of their «achievements», which she had so long and successfully cultivated on the basis of Western civilization.

For the first time such thoughts visited one of the heroes of the Second World War, General de Gaulle, who plunged a large amount of cash in the American ships and sent them to the U.S. to change the green «wrappers» for gold in France, which had already been stored in the ocean. Flustered by such impudence, the Americans eventually paid off with the presumptuous Frenchman. However, to repeat his audacious act of the French president could not. In 1969 he resigned as head of state. Since then, nobody even tried, though a hint question that is the economic model imposed by the U.S. Europe, could be wrong, unfair and even predatory. And it lasted until the first financial crisis of 2008. Gaddafi was killed because he dared to say that will not sell the Libyan oil for U.S. dollars. The next step is Iran.

Today, when the whole of Europe is under pressure from debt problems, the leaders of EU member states are aware that something needs to change. It is understood by ordinary citizens, who are increasingly satisfied as peaceful demonstrations, riots and frank, as the scales are already seems crowded. Why are there united Europe! Even in the United States develops movement «Occupy the Wall Street,» which aims to fight against the established financial and economic system, where only the rich get richer and the poor even more immersed in the abyss of poverty.

This can only mean one thing — Europe than ever we need a new system of economic and, above all, military security. Already, the EU draws their attention not on the West and the East. Everyone is expecting a possible interference with the decision of the European crisis from China. By the way, analysts do not exclude the Russian Federation in helping to address the debt burdens of the United Europe. What does this mean? Just the fact that in economic terms, the Old World, it seems, begins to tire of the ubiquitous Yankees and looking for new ways of development.

A good alternative to U.S. hegemony could be the same SCO, and the foundation of security in the post-founded by the CSTO. It is these organizations are equal partners in the EU on the mainland, not the U.S..

The future of Eastern Europe

United Europe is not as united as it may seem at first glance. As its basis, Germany and France are trying to pursue a more independent of U.S. policy. As has been pointed out earlier, these states have gradually come to understand what is required to work more closely with Russia, as it promises not only to certain preferences on prices for hydrocarbons, but also the opportunity to lead a more independent multi-vector policy.

But the U.S. through NATO seek to destabilize the situation on the eastern borders of the EU, and thereby prevent the economic, political and military co-operation of the Single Europe and Russia.

It should be noted that the overseas partner is actually «killed» the economy, as well as the armed forces of the new European members of NATO, such as Hungary, Romania, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, the Baltic countries.

In the coming geopolitical changes that the state will either have to change their orientation with the pro-American to European, or give up their sovereignty. An exception can only be Poland, which with its armed forces are strong enough and can have their position. However, without U.S. support, the Poles, too, will need to look very different orientations.

Therefore, all these states will either have to establish relations with Russia and its allies, or to remain «islands of resistance,» Europe-wide trends. This position is a losing, as all Euro-Asian integration processes (promising good economic and political dividends) will bypass them by.

Modern world has a very complex and polyhedral geopolitical scheme. Political and economic processes testify the transfer from bipolar to unipolar system. The US hegemony set up after the fall of the USSR does not respond to actual challenges. This statement is proven not only by famous European politicians but also by their overseas colleagues. Even Z.Bzhezinsky (the ideologist of the SU fall) admit that the golden age of control over society by the mass media is already done.

Instead of this old system we see the appearance of a totally new one which declares the independence of Europe from the USA. The economic pattern imposed by the New World after the Second World War shows its bankruptcy. As a result, financial and economic depression marked the end of the past decade.

Some political scientists believe that the whole world is on the edge of the second, more destructive wave of crisis. In addition the gap between rich and poor became dramatically wider and the number of starving aims to touch the 1 billion people figure.

Such situation leads to protests in many Western Europe countries as well as in the USA. And the increasing role of Russia and China may shift the geopolitical landscape. The number of those who support the idea of political economic and military transformation in Europe grows dramatically. There is a need of a new security system from Vladivostok to Brest (France). Large geopolitical changes that we may see in the nearest future may be also influenced by the system of oil and gas transport net which covers the whole Eurasia continent.

Hydrocarbons fuel the engine of geopolitical changes

In all times humanity had something that was of enormous value. Navigators tried to find the shortest way to India and discovered America. Later the Gold Rush influenced the exploration of new lands. But always the war accompanied the rush over fortune.

The development of technologies has shifted the emphasis to the hydrocarbons. Actually oil is called “Black Gold”. Nowadays almost all wars aim to own oil deposits. It took a couple of decades to the USA to clear the road to Middle East hydrocarbons and now they plan to attack Iran in order to establish a total influence in that region. The inhabitants of the White House understand well that those who have most of oil reserves will rule the world.

The core engine of future geopolitical changes in Europe will be oil and gas from Russia as well as from South Eastern Asia. Pipelines coming from East to West will determine basic cooperation directions.

Today Western Europe depends on the oil and gas delivery from Eastern part of the continent. Germany cooperates with Russia within the framework of “Nord Stream”. Gas pipeline “Nabucco” will cover Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Turkey. The nearest future shows some kind of politic and economic idyll on the continent.

Russia established good relations with Western Europe and aspire to develop the Southern one. “Gasprom” participate in building pipelines in Asia. Those steps of Kremlin conflict with USA interests. The White House plans to own the whole local pipeline infrastructure, e.g. the TAPI pipeline (which costs about 7,6 billion US dollars)

Russia also has interest in IPI project. Despite the fact that India has rejected to participate in it (under the pressure of the USA) China is ready to cooperate with IPI.

One of the core target of the USA in the region is to press out Russia from here. To solve this problem the White House has to destroy Iran. In this case Russia will not be able to protect its interests in the South Eastern Asia region.

Europe’s future is its own affair

Today we are witness of geopolitical changes in the world. Russia take active steps in order to influence not only in Asia but also in Europe. European states that do not have hydrocarbons cooperate with Russia. The advantages of such a cooperation are the following – Russia take only money for its resources and USA wants loyalty and solidarity in the idea of its hegemony. But leading European states want to argue this idea. Germany for example becomes more and more independent. Turkey refuses to give data from NATO AMD radars to Israel.

French government also understand that they can live without the USA. As a result we may see some geopolitical changes in the nearest future. Besides Russia aspires to create Eurasian Union and this organization may became alternative to the EU.

Regarding all those possible changes the White House starts to be more active on the borders of Russia. The USA still have polish and Baltic “Aces” and they may play them as soon as they need it. One of those who support the idea of joint NATO exercises is Lithuanian chief of the MOD. She is afraid of Russian invasion. Her phobias became stronger after the Russian-Georgian conflict.

On the other hand Russia and Belarus refused to conduct any training maneuver near NATO borders. In 2012 Poland and Baltic countries again will host NATO exercises on their territory. They will continue to work through possible conflict with Russia. But why? Because of the USA interests in the region. And they want to disturb the EU Russia cooperation by using such countries as Poland, Latvia and Lithuania. In this point the US interests find cohesion with those of Baltic countries and Warsaw.

The main problem lies in the fact that Russia and in this area easily find buyers for its hydrocarbons, and is constantly developing its pipeline, gradually switching to the Europeans, Middle Eastern and North African-controlled White House hydrocarbon sources on their own.

In this vein, it is clear the negative attitude of Poland and the Baltic countries to have a running pipeline «Nord Stream». All of these countries only lose by commissioning a joint Russian-German project. Transit only lose money, and the U.S. — its influence. And it costs much more money.

So the White House seeking to split the relations between Russia and Western Europe, cleverly hiding behind NATO. At last in the 2010 Lisbon Summit, NATO is not without power in Washington, the allies in the alliance have pretended not to hear the Russian president’s message about the necessity of building a new system of international security from Vancouver to Vladivostok. But there was also a positive signal at the summit was to support the position of the Russian leader of his French counterpart.

The inevitability of geopolitical changes have a significant impact on the existing economic model, which now hold the majority of Western countries. The fact that the first financial-economic crisis that struck the planet in the first decade of the millennium, has clearly demonstrated, even the most skeptical that the current economic model, which is tricky because there are residents of the White House has become obsolete.

At the time, the Americans pushed the German war machine (for example, the grandfather of former U.S. President George W. Bush Jr. supplied the oil in Germany) in order to maximize ease continental states and then to impose its own terms. Immediately after the Second World War, New World, by giving loans made in Western Europe’s economic model, which allows you to control the majority of the States of the European part of the continent. In parallel with these processes, Washington has made great efforts to break the «Red Block», and then to weaken Russia and to prevent its influence on Europe. To this end, the U.S. unleashed the war and continue to unleash all the key points of the planet, changing the geopolitical orientation of not only individual countries but also entire regions.

U.S. still supported the individual, the weakest economically and militarily to Western Europe, continue to reshape the planet for themselves. But deprived of such support, they quickly lose not only their power, but the leading role in the global chess game. The current financial and economic model allows Washington not to worry about their future. Even in the case of extreme crisis the world the West will have to save America first, and then take care of their interests. After the collapse of the U.S. not only destroy one of the most saturated markets in the world. Falling into the abyss, the U.S. economy will carry off for themselves all of their «achievements», which she had so long and successfully cultivated on the basis of Western civilization.

For the first time such thoughts visited one of the heroes of the Second World War, General de Gaulle, who plunged a large amount of cash in the American ships and sent them to the U.S. to change the green «wrappers» for gold in France, which had already been stored in the ocean. Flustered by such impudence, the Americans eventually paid off with the presumptuous Frenchman. However, to repeat his audacious act of the French president could not. In 1969 he resigned as head of state. Since then, nobody even tried, though a hint question that is the economic model imposed by the U.S. Europe, could be wrong, unfair and even predatory. And it lasted until the first financial crisis of 2008. Gaddafi was killed because he dared to say that will not sell the Libyan oil for U.S. dollars. The next step is Iran.

Today, when the whole of Europe is under pressure from debt problems, the leaders of EU member states are aware that something needs to change. It is understood by ordinary citizens, who are increasingly satisfied as peaceful demonstrations, riots and frank, as the scales are already seems crowded. Why are there united Europe! Even in the United States develops movement «Occupy the Wall Street,» which aims to fight against the established financial and economic system, where only the rich get richer and the poor even more immersed in the abyss of poverty.

This can only mean one thing — Europe than ever we need a new system of economic and, above all, military security. Already, the EU draws their attention not on the West and the East. Everyone is expecting a possible interference with the decision of the European crisis from China. By the way, analysts do not exclude the Russian Federation in helping to address the debt burdens of the United Europe. What does this mean? Just the fact that in economic terms, the Old World, it seems, begins to tire of the ubiquitous Yankees and looking for new ways of development.

A good alternative to U.S. hegemony could be the same SCO, and the foundation of security in the post-founded by the CSTO. It is these organizations are equal partners in the EU on the mainland, not the U.S..

The future of Eastern Europe

United Europe is not as united as it may seem at first glance. As its basis, Germany and France are trying to pursue a more independent of U.S. policy. As has been pointed out earlier, these states have gradually come to understand what is required to work more closely with Russia, as it promises not only to certain preferences on prices for hydrocarbons, but also the opportunity to lead a more independent multi-vector policy.

But the U.S. through NATO seek to destabilize the situation on the eastern borders of the EU, and thereby prevent the economic, political and military co-operation of the Single Europe and Russia.

It should be noted that the overseas partner is actually «killed» the economy, as well as the armed forces of the new European members of NATO, such as Hungary, Romania, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, the Baltic countries.

In the coming geopolitical changes that the state will either have to change their orientation with the pro-American to European, or give up their sovereignty. An exception can only be Poland, which with its armed forces are strong enough and can have their position. However, without U.S. support, the Poles, too, will need to look very different orientations.

Therefore, all these states will either have to establish relations with Russia and its allies, or to remain «islands of resistance,» Europe-wide trends. This position is a losing, as all Euro-Asian integration processes (promising good economic and political dividends) will bypass them by.

2 thoughts on “Europe’s future is in Eurasia Union

  1. That is very attention-grabbing, You are an excessively professional blogger. I have joined your feed and sit up for looking for extra of your fantastic post. Additionally, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Этот сайт использует Akismet для борьбы со спамом. Узнайте как обрабатываются ваши данные комментариев.